FAMUYIDE V. R.C. IRVING & CO. LTD.

Pages34-46
34
NIGERIAN SUPREME COURT
CASES
[1992j
3 N.S.C.C.
Exhibit was held by the trial court to be of no evidential value against the
appellant."
The issue as formulated for the respondent, though differently worded, has the
same meaning and effect.
Chief Ohwovoriole, S.A.N., for the appellant submitted that the trial judge
rejected Exhibit M and regarded it as of no evidential value by referring to the
portion of the trial judge's judgment quoted below:
"The 1st accused person (Peter Durugo) made a statement, Exhibit "M" dated
30th May, 1980, in which he narrated his activities about snatching various
makes of cars. As regards the present case in hand, the statements Exhibit "J"
and "JI" dated respectively 1st July, 1980 and 30th May, 1980 would appear to
be more relevant."
For the respondent, it was submitted that the appellant's submission is the
result of a misunderstanding of the portion of the judgment of the trial court which
learned counsel submitted could not be interpreted to mean a rejection of the
statement, Exhibit "M"
I am in total agreement with learned counsel for the respondent that the portion
of the judgment of the trial court can not be construed to be a rejection of the
statement, Exhibit 'M' which was admitted in evidence after a trial within trial. The
Court of Appeal properly considered the appellant's appeal, found no merit in it
and dismissed it.
It is for these reasons and for the more detailed and succinct reasons in the
lead Reasons for judgment of my learned brother,
Karibi-Whyte, J.S.C.,
which I
adopt as mine that I dismissed the appeal and upheld the conviction and sentence.
Appeal dismissed.
FAMUYIDE V. R.C. IRVING & CO. LTD.
MICHAEL OLATUNJI FAMUYIDE
APPELLANT
V.
R.C. IRVING & COMPANY LTD.
RESPONDENT
APPEAL No, SC. 85/1988.
SUPREME COURT OF NIGERIA
KARIBI-WHYTE,
J.S.C.
KAWU,
J.S.C.
WALT,
J.S.C.
KUTIGI,
J.S.C.
MOHAMMED,
J.S.C.
25th September, 1992.
Practice and Procedure - Order 27 rule 2 High Court of Lagos Civil Procedure Rules 1972
- Interrogatories - When leave may be given - Interrogatories - Principles of -
Interrogatories - Aim and object of - Interrogatories - Extent party interrogating may
go.
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT