OKAGBUE & 2 ORS. V. ROMAINE

Pages130-142
OKAGBUE & ORS. V. ROMAINE
130
OKAGBUE & ORS. V. ROMAINE
5
FRANCIS IKWUNE OKAGBUE & 2 ORS
APPELLANTS
V
10 JANET ROMAINE
RESPONDENT
SUIT NO. SC 63/1981
SUPREME COURT OF NIGERIA
IRIKEFE,
J.S.C.
BELLO,
J.S.C.
15
IDIGBE,
J.S.C.
OBASEKI,
J.S.C.
NNAMANI,
J.S.C.
21st May, 1982
20
Evidence - Evidence that "goes to no issue" - Meaning - Unpleaded facts tending
to prove facts in issue in pleadings - Relevance at trial
Land Law - Trespass - Invitee - Liability as trespasser where limits of his
invitation exceeded.
25
ISSUES:
1.
Whether a party can sue a person who came into his property lawfully in
trespass when such person has overstayed his welcome.
2.
Whether evidence which, though not pleaded, is received at the trial, can be
30
said to go to no issue.
FACTS
The plaintiff/respondent, claimec, damages for trespass to land, and an injunc-
tion restraining the appellants from erecting any building on said land or doing
anything inconsistent with the plaintiff's rights over said land. The defendants
35
claimed that they were invitees or licenses on the land and that they could not there-
fore be sued as trespassers. The plaintiff claimed that the defendants had ex-
ceeded the purpose for which she invited them into the land. The trial Judge after
reviewing the evidence, held in favour of the plaintiff. The defendants appealed
to the Federal Court of Appeal, contending that the trial Judge's decision was based
40
on findings of fact based on evidence which should have been disregarded as it
went to no issue. The appeal was dismissed and they thereupon appealed to the
Supreme Court.
HELD:
1.
There is no merit whatsoever ,n the appeal, and it is accordingly dismissed.
45
The respondent's evidence was on facts pleaded in the Statement of Claim. A
person who is brought on land for a purpose, and then exceeds the purpose
for which he was brought unto the land, ceases to be a licencee and becomes
a trespasser.
2.
The expression "evidence in respect of matters not pleaded goes to no issue"
50
is only confirmatory of the well known principle of pleading that a party to an
action must plead the material facts on which he relies. This rule of pleading
does not (and has never) require(d) a party to plead the evidence by which the
material facts are to be proved. The respondents evidence complained of by
the appellants, was on fact she pleaded in the statement of claim and

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT