FADARE & ORS V. A-G. OF OYO STATE

Pages52-65
52
NIGERIAN SUPREME COURT CASES
[1982] N.S.C.C.
one set of claimants, and another set of persons to represent the parties re-
sisting the claim, and the right might be finally decided as between all par-
ties in a suit so constituted."
The rule has been described as "a rule of convenience only" (See
Harrison v.
5
Abergavenny (Marquis of)
(1887) 3 T.L.R. 324 at page 325; as a rule that was orig-
inated for convenience, it has been relaxed. See
Bedford (Duke of) v. Ellis
(1901)
A.C. 1 at page 8 is a rule which ought not to be treated as rigid but as a flexible
tool of convenience in the administration of justice. (See
John v Rees
(1969) 2
W.L.R. 1294 at page 1306.)"
10
For the above reasons and the reasons given by my learned brother, Uwais,
J.S.C., I hereby dismiss the appeal. I would and I hereby award the respondent
the same costs as ordered by my learned brother, Sowemimo, J.S.C.
ESO, J.S.C.:
I have had the advantage of reading in draft the judgment just
15
delivered by my learned brother Uwais, J.S.C. I agree with this judgment. I must
also add that as Sowemimo, J.S.C. has said in his judgment it is now settled law
where it is patent to the trial court that some individuals could not for good reasons
be in position to represent a community, then it would be wrong for the court to
make an order for such representation.
20
The appeal must be dismissed and it is hereby dismissed. I abide by the order
as to costs contained in the judgment of the Presiding Justice Sowemimo, J.S.C.
Appeal
dismissed.
25
FADARE & ORS V. A-G. OF OYO STATE
30
LASISI FADARE & ORS.
APPELLANTS
V
A-G. OF OYO STATE
RESPONDENT
SUIT NO. SC. 29/1981
SUPREME COURT OF NIGERIA
35
SOWEMIMO,
J.S.C.
ESO,
J.S.C.
ANIAGOLU,
J.S.C.
NNAMANI,
J.S.C.
UWAIS,
J.S.C.
40
2nd April, 1982
Land Law - Public lands acquisition - Claim for compensation - Statute barred
- Limitation of action - Compensation claim for compulsory acquisition - When
time begins to run.
Practice and Procedure - Preliminary objection - Whether made after issues have
been joined - Whether demurer application - High Court Civil Procedure Rule
of Western Nigeria 0. 22 R. 2 &. 3.
45
50
Appeals - Supreme Court - Whether points not raised in the courts below can
be raised in the Supreme Court.

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT