ROAD TRANS. EIVIP ASS_ OF NIG. V. N.U.R.T.W.

Pages290-302
290
NIGERIAN SUPREME COURT CASES [1992] 1 N.S.C.C.
any manner whatsoever treating the 5th defendant as the traditional ruler or
Eze Uzu or Obi of Awka."
The order made by the lower court amounts to a judgment by an appellate court
in respect of a matter yet to be heard by the trial court.
It is for these reasons and the fuller reasons given by my learned brother, Uche
Omo, J.S.C. that I will also allow the appeal, set aside the ruling of the lower court
to the effect that the recognition accorded the 5th appellant is null and void. I abide
by the order for costs in favour of the appellants.
BABALAKIN, J.S.C. I have had a preview of the judgment just delivered by my
learned brother Omo, J.S.C. I agree with the reasoning and conclusions reached
in the judgment.
The judgment has extensively and effectively treated all the relevant issues for
determination raised in the appeal.
I too allow the appeal. I set aside the ruling of the Court of appeal appealed
against, including its order setting aside the recognition accorded the 5th appel-
lant, is hereby set aside.
I award N1,000.00 costs in favour of the appellants.
Appeal allowed.
20
ROAD TRANS. EIVIP
ASS_
OF NIG. V. N.U.R.T.W.
R.T.E.A.N.
APPELLANT
V.
N.U.R.T.W.
RESPONDENT
APPEAL No. SC. 4/1989.
SUPREME COURT OF NIGERIA
UWAIS,
J.S.C.
KAWU,
J.S.C.
WALT
J.S.C.
OMO,
J.S.C.
BABALAKIN,
J.S.C.
21st February, 1992.
Appeals - Brief - Purpose of - Oral argument - Party not allowed to resile from position he
took in brief of judgment - When taking new position - Parties should be invited to
address court.
Locus standi -Effect - Proper consequential order to he made when plaintiff lacks locus
standi.
5
10
15
25
30
35
40
45
50

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT