ODOFIN V. AGU 5

Pages520-535
520
NIGERIAN SUPREME COURT CASES
[19921 1 N.S.C.C.
ODOFIN V. AGU
5
1.
PETER ADEBOYE ODOFIN
2.
OLATUNJI ONOKE
APPELLANTS
V.
10
1.
CHIEF AGU
2.
JIMOH ONI
APPEAL No. SC. 101/1989.
SUPREME COURT OF NIGERIA
KARIBI-WHYTE,
J.S.C.
NNAEMEKA-AGU, J.S.C.
0 LATAWU RA,
J.S.C.
A KPATA ,
J.S.C.
BABALAKIN,
J.S.C.
27th March, 1992.
Appeals - Appellate jurisdiction - Nature and sources of - Leave to apppeal sought out of
time - Court ofAppeal granting ex
-
tension of time to appeal in the absence of application
therefor - Propriety of - Effect on jurisdiction of court - Leave to appeal - S.25(1) Court
of Appeal Act - Nature of provisions of - Notice of appeal - Importance of
Jurisdiction - Essential elements for exercise of - Appellate jurisdiction - Source of -
Whether can be inherent - Court's jurisdiction to hear a matter - Whether can be waived
by parties.
Legal Practitioners - Incomplete record of appeal - Duty of counsel in relation thereto.
Legislation - Court of Appeal Act, section 25(1) - Nature and purport of
Practice and Procedure - Application for extension of time within which to apply for leave
and for leave to appeal - Whether competent where applicant has not applied for
extension of time to file notice of appeal and time within which to appeal has expired
- Judicial power - When exercised - Court awarding relief not claimed by a party -
Propriety of
Words and Phrases - "Consequential order" - Meaning of
ISSUES:
1.
What are the essential elements for the exercise by a court of its jurisdiction?
2.
What is the nature and purport of the provisions of section 25(1) of the Court
of Appeal Act, 1976.
3.
What is the source of an appellate jurisdiction?
4.
What is the importance of a Notice of Appeal?
RESPONDENTS
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
ODOM V. AGU
521
FACTS:
In a suit commenced in the Akoko South Grade I Customary Court in Ondo
State, the plaintiff's claimed the defendants the ownership of a parcel of land,
5
damages for trespass and an injunction. After hearing evidence adduced by both
parties, the plaintiffs were granted title over the land in dispute and awarded
damages for trespass on 30/9/83.
On 16/5/85 the defendants' appeal to the High Court was dismissed. And
having failed to seek leave to appeal within the statutory period of three months,
10 the defendants on 4/10/85 applied to the Court of Appeal for extension of time
within which to seek leave to appeal and for leave to so appeal. However, the
defendants did not apply for extension of time within which to appeal.
In its ruling delivered on 21/10/85, the Court of Appeal granted the defendants
leave to appeal and extended time within which to appeal against the judgment of
15
the High Court. On
11/1
1
/
8
5
Notice of Appeal was filed pursuant to the Court of
Appeal Order (i.e. nearly six months after the judgment appealed against), and on
7/12/88 the Court of Appeal allowed the appeal of the defendants and set aside
the judgment of the High Court.
The plaintiffs, being dissatisfied, appealed to the Supreme Court against the
20
judgment of the Court of Appeal, on ground
inter alia,
that the prayer for extension
of time to appeal was granted
suo Motu
and gratuitously.
HELD:
1.
One of the essential elements for the exercise by a court of its jurisdiction is
that "the subject matter of the case is within its jurisdiction, and there is no
feature in the case which prevents the court from exercising its jurisdiction."
The other element is that "the case comes before the court initiated by due
process of law, and upon fulfillment of any condition precedent to the exercise
of jurisdiction."
(See
p.525,
lines 42 - 46).
2.
The provisions of section 25(1) of the Court of Appeal Act, 1976, with the
expression "shall give notice of appeal or notice of his application for leave to
appeal" are clearly mandatory. Effect must be given to the words. Thus except
where the court has enlarged the time pursuant to an application properly
35
brought before it seeking to enlarge the periods to appeal in a civil cause or
matter, the period prescribed in section 25(1)(a) applies. (See
p.527, lines
49-50 & p.528, lines 1-8).
3.
The exercise of appellate jurisdiction is entirely statutory. An appellate court
derives its jurisdiction from the statute creating it and other enabling statutory
40
powers.. There can therefore not be an inherent jurisdiction outside the statute.
Thus the provisions of section 6 of the Constitution 1979 which deal with
inherent powers is of assistance only where there is a valid exercise of
jurisdiction.
(See p.527, lines 19 22).
45 4. The Notice of Appeal is without doubt the foundation of an appeal. Where an
application to appeal is made out of time, a notice of appeal made out of time
will require a prayer for enlargement of time within which to file such notice of
appeal. In the absence of a notice of appeal there is no appeal before the
court.
(See p.528, lines 24-29).
50 5. The competence vel non of a court is a legal condition which cannot be waived
by the parties. Where the condition of want of competence exists, it is a
fundamental defect fatal to adjudication. it is not a mere irregularity which can
be cured by considerations of substantial justice. (See
p.529, lines 8-12).
25
30

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT