AFRICAN PETROLEUM LTD. V. J.K. OWODUNNI

Pages617-638
AFRICAN PETROLEUM LTD. V. J.K. OWODUNN1
817
contacted to testify. No one had been able to explain, by legally admissible
evidence, what happened to the deceased after he was removed from Akare
Village on 6/6/83, This is not a case where death could have been inferred because
there was an unaccounted period of two weeks between the incident and the death
5 of the deceased. The evidence of the medical officer who performed the autopsy
on the body of the deceased left a serious doubt as to whether it was actually on
the deceased, in this incident, that he performed the autopsy. It is elementary to
state that such doubts or lapses should .enure for the benefit of the appellant.
The appeal is hereby allowed. The judgments of the High Court Minna dated
10
7th November, 1987 and that of the Court of Appeal dated 11th October, 1989 are
hereby set aside. This court hereby orders that the appellant be discharged and
acquitted.
Appeal allowed.
15
AFRICAN PETROLEUM LTD. V. J.K. OWODUNNI
20
AFRICAN PETROLEUM LTD.
RESPONDENT
V.
J.K. OWODUNNI
APPELLANT
25
APPEAL No. SC. 72/1990.
SUPREME COURT OF NIGERIA
KARIBI-WHYTE,
J.S.C.
KAWU,
J.S.C.
30
NNAEM EKA-AGU, J.S.C.
WALT,
J.S.C.
OMO,
J.S.C.
15th November, 1991.
35
Appeals - Issues for determination - How formulated - Issue raised or argument advanced
on an issue not arising from a ground of appeal - incompetency of
Evidence - Uncontradicted evidence - Effect of
40
Landlord and Tenant - Tenancies - Nature of - Types of - Determinants of - Tenancy at
sufferance - Statutory tenancy - Distinction between - Statutory tenancy - Need to
comply with the provisions of the Rent Control and Recovery of Residential Premises
Law No.9 Lagos State of 1976 before ejection of tenant thereunder - Tenancy at
sufferance - Non-existence of under the rent Control and Recovery of Residential
45
Premises Law No.9 of Lagos State, 1976 - Claim for either mesne profits or damages
for use and occupation - When made.
Words and Phrases - Tenancy at sufferance - Meaning of - Statutoty tenancy - Meaning of
- Mesne profits - Meaning of - Tenancy at will - Meaning of
50
618
NIGERIAN SUPREME COURT CASES
[1991] 2 N.S.C.C.
ISSUES:
1.
When may a tenancy be said to be either statutory or at sufferance and whether
either of them has to comply with the provisions of the Rent Control and
Recovery of Residential Premises Law No.9 of Lagos State, 1976?
5
2.
What are the incidents of "mesne profits" and "damages for use and
occupation"?
3.
What is the duty of the court in calculating the damages for use and occupation?
4.
What is an issue for determination in an appeal?
10
FACTS:
The plaintiff sued the defendant at the Lagos State High Court for recovery of
possession of premises,
mesne
profit and an injunction. The defendant was a
director and employee of the plaintiff. The plaintiff allowed the defendant to occupy
the house and premises in dispute. The defendant was to pay rent at the rate of
15
N1,000.00 per annum or 15% of his annual salary, whichever was less. The sum
was later reduced to N800.00 and then to N400.00 per annum. At the instance of
both parties, the rent tribunal later fixed the appropriate rent of the premises at
N13,500.00 per annum. The tribunal allowed the plaintiff two more years on the
premises. The defendant held over the premises inspite of several notices to quit
20
and intention to go to court. The defendant was given eight days notice to quit.
After hearing the evidence and the addresses of counsel. the learned trial judge
(Famakinwa, J.)
held that the defendant was a monthly and not a yearly tenant,
and that he should have been given a month's notice to quit and 7 days notice of
intention to recover possession. If he is still holding over, he becomes a statutory
25
tenant; and an action must be commenced to recover possession from him; and
that not having been done the tenancy was not properly determined. Alternatively,
the judge held that the defendant was a service tenant and that his tenancy expired
with the termination of his employment. He there and then became a tenant at
sufferance, who requires no notice to quit. He made an order for the defendant to
30
vacate the premises immediately and to pay N13,500.00 per annum, that is,
N81,000.00 from 1981 to 1986 as rent.
The defendant appealed to the Court of Appeal. In allowing the appeal, the
Court of Appeal held that the defendant was a statutory tenant and not a tenant at
sufferance and was entitled to the necessary notices under the Recovery of
35
Premises Law of Lagos State. The order of the lower court was reversed and the
defendant was held to be entitled to remain in possession of the premises until the
tenancy was determined according to law. The amount payable to the plaintiffs as
mesne
profits for use and occupation of the premises was assessed at N65,000.00
till the date of judgment.
40
The defendant appealed to the Supreme Court on the issue of
rnesne
profit.
The plaintiff also cross-appealed on the holding that the defendant was a statutory
tenant and thus was entitled to a valid notice to quit.
HELD:
45
1. A tenancy at sufferance is one in which the original grant by the landlord to the
tenant has expired, usually by effluxion of time, but the tenant holds over the
premises. In such a case the tenant's right to occupation of the premises to
which he had come in upon a lawful title by grant is at an end, although he has
no more title as such, he continues in possession of the land or premises
50
without any further grant or agreement by the landlord on whom the right to
the reversion resides. One necessary pre-condition of such a tenancy is that

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT