SWISS-NIGERIAN WOOD INDUSTRIES LIMITED V. BOLO

Pages235-243
SWISS-NIGERIAN WOOD INDUSTRIES LIMITED V. BOGO
235
of 4.735 acres. It is within the area edged red and consists of parcels of land
granted by the 1st defendant to the 2nd to 9th defendants. On the north eastern
side of the land in dispute and also within the area edged red is a parcel of land
belonging to the plaintiffs and shown on the plan as Awoyale Compound. It would
5
appear from the plan that there are 5 buildings and a pottery in Awoyale Com-
pound. On the western side of the land in dispute and also within the area edged
red is a vast area of Kola and cocoa plantation which is stated on the plan to be-
long to the plaintiffs. It is thus clear from the plan that the land in dispute is bounded
on the north, north west and south west by land stated to belong to the plaintiffs.
10
The Court of Appeal was of the opinion that, by virtue of section 45 of the Evi-
dence Act, the location of the land in dispute which, except for the south and south
west, is completely surrounded by land belonging to the plaintiffs, raised the pres-
umption that the land in dispute belonged to the plaintiffs. We consider, that, in
the instant case, this conclusion is inescapable as the land in dispute is virtually
15
encircled by the plaintiffs' land and as the defendants never resisted the plaintiffs'
claim of ownership of adjoining parcels of land which are so situated or connected
with the land in dispute as to justify drawing the inference that the plaintiffs are the
owners of the land in dispute. We are therefore of the view that the Court of Ap-
peal was right in its application of the provisions of Section 45 of the Evidence
20
Act to the facts of this case.
For the foregoing reasons, this appeal fails on all grounds and it is hereby dis-
missed with costs to the plaintiffs/respondents assessed at 38 guineas.
Appeal dismissed.
25
SWISS-NIGERIAN WOOD INDUSTRIES LIMITED
V. BOGO
30
35
40
SWISS-NIGERIAN WOOD
INDUSTRIES LIMITED
V.
BOGO
SUPREME COURT OF NIGERIA
COKER,
J.S.C.
LEWIS,
J.S.C.
MADARIKAN,
J.S.C.
3rd July, 1970
APPELLANT
RESPONDENT
SUIT NO. SC 14/70
Commercial Law - Contract - Damages - General Damages - Damages must be
proved both as to fact and amount - Without proof of amount damage nominal
- Plaintiffs base estimate no proof of amount - Distinction between special
and general damages normally inapt in contract - General damages not
recoverable where ntay duplicate award under particular head or be merely
punitive
Remedies - Damages - Measure of damages - Damages reasonably within
contemplation of parties at time of contract, or arising naturally from breach,
as probable result of breach - Speculative or sentimental claims excluded unless
within contract
45
50

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT