NWANGO V. THE QUEEN

Pages264-268
264
NIGERIAN SUPREME COURT CASES
[1963] N.S.C.C.
"I shot the deceased because I was angry that the deceased refused to show
me where he shot my father and also to stop him from running away. I was
angry because the deceased killed my father."
Discarding the appellant's evidence that he shot Achong to stop him from run-
5
ning away, or to prevent his going and killing other relatives - the former reason
was rejected by the Judge, the latter is speculative on the evidence - we have these
causes of anger:
(1)
that Achong killed his father;
10
(2)
that Achong said he was not the first person to kill a man;
(3)
that Achong refused to take the appellant to where his father was.
As already stated, the learned Judge did not think that cause No. (1) was a law-
ful cause of provocation. Cause No. (2) was not dealt with in the judgment; that in
15
our view is a serious omission, and we are left without the benefit of knowing how
that heartless statement might have weighed in the Judge's mind as an insult. In
addition, the manner of considering cause No. (3) was not satisfactory: the fact
that the deceased wanted first to report to the townspeople, and did later take
them to where the appellant's father was shot, does not eliminate the appellant's
anger with Achong for not taking him straight to where his father was; here again
we cannot tell what view the learned Judge would have taken if he had considered
cause No. (3) in the proper light.
There is in our opinion substance in the complaint that the trial Judge did not
appraise the facts of provocation adequately; consequently there was a substan-
25
tial miscarriage of justice, and that makes it a proper case for allowing the appeal.
The conviction of murder and sentence of death are quashed and replaced by
a conviction for manslaughter and a sentence of seven years.
Appeal allowed, conviction of
manslaughter substituted.
30
NWANGO V. THE QUEEN
35
IYEDE NWANGC
APPELLANT
V
THE
QUEEN
RESPONDENT
40
SUIT No. FSC 359/1963
SUPREME COURT OF NIGERIA
ADEMOLA,
C.J.N
TAYLOR,
J.S.C.
BAIRAMIAN,
J.S.C.
21st November, 1963.
Criminal Law - Homicide - Provocation - Time to cool - Criminal Code, 5.283,
S.318.
ISSUE:
1. Can an accused who calculatedly stabbed another person to death claim that
he acted in the heat of passion and thus plead provocation as a defence?
45
50

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT