MINISTER OF LANDS & HOUSING V. AYONISHEN FAMILY & ORS.

Pages233-237
MINISTER OF LANDS & HOUSING V. AYONISHEN FAMILY & ORS. 233
claim and the remedy of injunction which they sought is essentially a remedy
in
personam.
Thus, apart from the fact that no material exists in the pleadings and
the evidence before us to justify the grant of an injunction against the present re-
spondents, it cannot be argued with propriety that liability to an injunction against
5
the deceased defendant enures against her representatives for the simple reason
of that representation. It is not difficult to see that section 15(1) of the Administra-
tion of Estates Law does not enable an injunction to be granted.
The defendant maintained in the High Court and before us that she was en-
titled to range as she did over the area edged green in her plan (exhibit B). This
10
area was not granted to her ancestors, nor to her and was not conceded to her by
the plaintiffs. The observations already made by us in this judgment no doubt in-
dicate that we would have given judgment against the defendant (were she alive)
on the claims for trespass and injunction. In the circumstances that now exist, how-
ever, and on the strength of our remarks on this claim, we propose to make no
15
order on the claim for injunction. No order is therefore made on this claim.
The judgment of the High Court, Akure, in Suit No. AK/8/61 is hereby reversed
and set aside. The following orders are made by this court.:-
1.
The appellants are granted a declaration of title in respect of the area edged
20
pink in their plan (No. BK 4439- exhibit A), declaring that they are the owners
thereof.
2.
The respondents are entitled to occupy and use the portion of land edged
yellow on exhibit A subject Lo good behaviour and in accordance with na-
tive law and custom. It is hereby adjudged that only that portion was allotted
25
to the ancestor of the defendant, Saja Awolo, by the ancestors of the appel-
lants for use in accordance with native law and custom.
3.
The defendant's-counter claim is dismissed.
4.
The respondents must pay to the appellants the cost of these proceedings
fixed in the court below at 60 guineas and in this Court at 100 guineas.
30
Appeal allowed.
MINISTER OF LANDS & HOUSING V.
35
AYONISHEN FAMILY & ORS.
THE MINISTER OF LANDS AND HOUSING
APPELLANT
40
V.
AYONISHEN FAMILY AND OTHERS
RESPONDENTS
SUPREME COURT OF NIGERIA
BRETT,
J.S.C.
COKER,
J.S.C.
45
MADARIKAN,
J.S.C.
27th October, 1967
Land Law - Compulsory acquisition of land - Delayed payment of compensation
- Award of interest by court over compensation awarded - Award for loss
50
of rents and mesne profits - Public Lands Acquisition Law (Western Nigeria)
s.11.

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT