IZIOGO V. THE QUEEN

Pages68-71
68
NIGERIAN SUPREME COURT CASES [1963] N.S.C.C.
into the witness box and explain these transactions. No ground has been shown
for interfering with the Judge's finding that the appellant stole these sums.
In the result the conviction on count 1 is set aside, and judgment of acquittal is
entered. The appeal is dismissed as regards the convictions on counts 8 to 18 in-
clusive.
Appeal allowed on the first count
and dismissed on the others.
IZIOGO V. THE QUEEN
MBAM IZIOGO
APPELLANT
15
V
THE QUEEN
RESPONDENT
SUIT NO. FSC 461/1962
FEDERAL SUPREME COURT.
BRETT,
Ag. C.J.F.
20
TAYLOR,
F.J.
COKER,
Ag. F.J.
15th February, 1963.
Legislation- Evidence Act, s.34(3) - Constitution (1960) of Eastern Nigeria, s.42.
25
Criminal Law- Criminal Law - Depositions - Reception in evidence at trial -
Deposition of medical officer - Letter from Permanent Secretary on doctor's
absence abroad.
30
ISSUE:
1.
Whether a court can under s.34(3) of the Evidence Act receive a doctor's
deposition on the strength of a letter signed by his head of department, the
Permanent Secretary of the Ministry of Health, explaining the doctor's absence.
FACTS:
3
The appellant killed the deceased, and the only point on appeal related to the
reception of the doctor's deposition on the strength of a letter signed by the Per-
manent Secretary of the Ministry of Health, that the doctor was abroad on a train-
ing course. For the appellant the objection was that the letter was not signed by
the doctor's Head of Department, as required by s.34(3) of the Evidence Act; the
respondent relied on s.42 of the Constitution of Eastern Nigeria, which provides
that subject to the Minister's direction and control, the department shall be under
the supervision of a Permanent Secretary.
HELD:
A letter purporting to come from the Permanent Secretary of a Ministry in the
4
usual course of business is a letter to which the minister has subscribed and ema-
nates from him because s.42 of the Constitution of Eastern Nigeria provides that
the Permanent Secretary shall exercise superisory powers while general control
and derection is vested on the Minister. The trial Court was right under s.34(3) of
the Evidence Act to here received the doctor's deposition on the strength of the
5
letter signed by tie Permanent Secretary.
[As to
admissibility of depositions,
see 11 HALSBURY'S LAWS 4th Edition 244
para 427.]
5
10

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT