GIREMABE V. BORNU NATIVE AUTHORITY

Pages217-219
GIREMABE V. BORNU NATIVE AUTHORITY.
217
in a statement which he made to the police after her death. He said "I
beat
her with the back of a matchet.
I
did not cut her at all
I
beat her with the
matchet at the neck, she fell and died," There was medical evidence that the de-
ceased's injury could not have been caused by the back of a matchet.
5
In his statement to the police the appellant said that he was insane when he
killed the deceased. He did not make that defence at the trial, but in his grounds
of appeal he says that no reason can be adduced for his having killed the de-
ceased save that he lost his mind. The learned trial Judge considered the defence
of insanity in view of what the appellant had said in his statement to the police, and
10
found that insanity had not been proved. On the evidence, that finding cannot be
disputed.
At the trial, the appellant said that he had killed the deceased upon her telling
him, for the first time, that he was not responsible for her pregnacy, which he said
he knew to be the case, and that he was not the father of her last child. The learned
15
trial Judge disbelieved the accused, and observed that, even if the accused had
been believed, a confession of adultery without more is not sufficient to reduce a
charge which would otherwise be murder to manslaughter. That also cannot be
disputed.
It is not possible to take exception to the learned trial Judge's findings, and
20
learned Counsel assigned to argue the appeal for the appellant had nothing to say
in support of it. Accordingly, we dismissed the appeal.
Appeal dismissed.
25
GIREMABE V. BORNU NATIVE AUTHORITY.
30 CHIROMA GIREMABE
V
BORNU NATIVE AUTHORITY
APPELLANT
RESPONDENTS
SUIT NO. FSC 207/1961
FEDERAL SUPREME COURT.
35
BRETT,
Ag. C.J.F.
HURLEY,
C.J.N.R.
BELLAMY,
Ag. C.J. LAGOS
11th August, 1961.
40
Courts - Supreme Court - Retrial - Federal Supreme Court Ordinance 1960 (No.
12 of 1960) Section 30.
Constitutional Law - Nigeria (Constitution) Order in Council, 1960, Second Schedule:
Part I, item 44; Part III item I(b) - Inconsistency - Federal and Regional
45
Statutes - Implied amendment of Regional Statute - N.R. Criminal Procedure
Code (N.R. No 11 of 1960) sections 185, 314, 35.
ISSUES:
1.
Whether the Supreme Court can quash a conviction of culpable homicide
50
punishable with death where the records of the trial fail to disclose evidence
that the deceased died as a result of the injuries received in the assault on him
by the accused.
2.
Whether the Supreme Court has power to give leave that an accused be charged
before the High Court.

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT