A-G., EASTERN REGION V. BRIGGS

Pages242-246
242
NIGERIAN SUPREME COURT CASES
[1964] N.S.C.C.
A-G, EASTERN REGION V. BRIGGS
5
A-G, EASTERN REGION
V
A.B. BRIGGS
APPELLANT
RESPONDENT
SUIT NO. FSC 258/1963
10
SUPREME COURT,
BRETT,
BAIRAMIAN,
ONYEAMA,
COKER,
IDIGBE,
6th November, 1964
NIGERIA
Ag. C.J.N.
J.S.C.
J.S.C.
J.S.C.
J.S.C.
15
Constitutional Law - Right to fair hearing - Right of Governor to execute
20
recommendation - whether court can question or grant remedy - (Constitution)
Order in Council 1954 Section 180A(1); section 105 (3), section 180 I, section
180D, section 180K - Eastern Region Public Service Commission Regulations
(1958). Regulation 30; Nigeria Offices of Governor - General and Governors)
Order in Council 1954.
25
ISSUES:
1. Whether it is possible for a court to grant a remedy to a party contesting the
validity of an act of a Governor acting on the recommendation of the Public
Service Commission.
30
FACTS:
The Respondent had been a Grade II Teacher in the service of the Government
of Eastern Region and was promoted on probation to the post of Education Of-
ficer. He was alleged to have been involved in some impropriety and eventually,
he received a letter purportedly conveying the order of the Governor reverting him
35
to the post of Teacher Grade II. He applied to have the order set aside and was
successful The order was made on the recommendation of the Public Service
Commission in accordance with certain relevant portions of the constitution.
Power was granted to the Governor of a region under section 180D of the (Con-
stitution) Order-in-council 1954, to provide for 'the organisation of the work of the
40
commissions". The Trial Judge however held that the Respondent did not hold his
office at the pleasure of the Crown.
HELD:
1.
Sections 17 and 20(2)(c) of the Nigeria (Offices of Governor-General and
Governors) Order in Council 1954 make it plain that a person appointed to an
45
office constituted for the region, by the Governor including the office of
Education Officer is to hold office at the pleasure of the Governor and only the
legislature could provide otherwise. The Governor was only doing what the
constitution order required him to do.
2.
Executive actions should be entitled to immunity against challenge in the courts
50
when relating to an act of the Governor in pursuance of a constitution order.
Court therefore has no power to grant the Respondent such a remedy.
G.C.M.
Onyiuke (Mr. C.D.C. Anyaegbulam State Council)
for appellant.

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT