FEDERAL BOARD OF INLAND REVENUE V. NASR

Pages303-306
FED. BOARD OF INLAND REVENUE V. NASR
303
FED. BOARD OF INLAND REVENUE V. NASR
5
FEDERAL BOARD OF INLAND REVENUE
APPELLANT/RESPONDENT
V
10 DIAB A. NASR
RESPONDENT/APPELLANT
SUIT NO. SC 205/1964
SUPREME COURT OF NIGERIA
BRETT,
J.S.C.
ONYEAMA,
J.S.C.
15
AJEGBO,
J.S.C.
23rd December, 1964
Legislation - Companies Income Tax Act, 1961, s.57(7) - High Court of Lagos
(Income Tax appeals) Rules, 1957 (in 1958 Laws of the Federation, vol. VIII).
20
R.15(2) - Income Tax Act (cap.85 in 1958 Laws of the Federation), s.18(3)(a)
- Income Tax Management Act, 1961, s.20(5), and Second Schedule, para.1(ii)
Appeals - Income Tax - Onus of proof on tax payer - Opportunity of calling
evidence, vel non - Assessable income - Income from employment - Income
25
from rents - Taxpayer making a deed of gift of house.
ISSUES:
1. On whom lies the onus of proving that an assessment by the Federal Board of
Inland Revenue is excessive.
30
2. Whether the rents accruing from a house which a tax
payer has conveyed by deed of gift, are part of his assessable income under
par. 1 (ii) of the second schedule of the Income Tax Management Act. 1961.
FACTS:
The Board assessed the tax payer for the years 1960/61 and 1961/62; the Ap-
35
peal Commissioner substituted other assessments. The High Court set aside all
assessments and referred the matter back to the Board with directions. Both sides
appealed. The High Court held that the tax payer made a valid deed of gift in 1959
conveying a house to himself and other members of his family as tenants in com-
mon. The rents were said to have formed most of his income. The Board argued
40
that the entire rents must be deemed to be the tax payer's income by virtue of
para.1(ii) of the Second Schedule to the Income Tax Management Act, 1961. The
Appeal Commissioners included in the assessable income for 1961/62 a sum of
£500 received by the tax payer as Director's fees during 1960/61. The Board sub-
mitted that the £500 could be included in the assessable income for 1960/61 under
45
s.18(3)(a) of the Income Tax Act (repealed) if the £500 was a new source of in-
come.
HELD:
1.
The tax-payer has the onus to 'show by evidence both that the assessment is
excessive and by how much it is excessive.
50
2. (1) The provisions of paragraph 1 (iii) of the Second Schedule to the Income
Tax Management Act only apply if the instrument creating the settlement or
trust expressly permits the senior or other person to make use of the income,
and it is not enough for the Board to show that he has in fact done so; but

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT