EX PARTE IKORO V. GOVERNOR, EASTERN REGION & ANOR

Pages25-29
EX PARTE IKORO V. GOVERNOR, EASTERN REGION & ANOR.
25
they kept an eye on the private account, but the customer could say that he was
being allowed to overdraw on the firm's account without reference to the state of
his private account, and could in my view rightly, argue that the case fell within the
exception in the statement of the law given in Halsbury, which was quoted earlier
5
in this judgment.
I have dealt with this case as if it were quite like the English cases which I have
cited from Halsbury, under the above statement of the law. I should, however,
note that in those cases the accounts were in the same name, though one account
was called the loan account and the other the current account, or, in the Green-
10
halgh case, the provisional bill account and the general account. In the case in
hand one account is in the name of "Opaleye, Rafiu Afolabi Bello", and the other
account is in the name of "Fakemo Brothers", and I think it can be said with justice
that that very strongly implied an agreement to keep them separate and distinct,
without any right on the part of the Bank to combine them or to transfer assets from
15
one account to the other, at any rate not without reasonable notice of the intention
so to do.
I would disallow the appeal. No question of costs arises.
Ademola, C.J.F.:
I concur.
Taylor, F.J.:
I concur.
20
Appeal dismissed.
EX PARTE IKORO V. GOVERNOR, EASTERN
REGION & ANOR.
THE QUEEN: Ex parte OJIEGBO IKORO
of NGODO
APPELLANT
V
THE GOVERNOR, EASTERN REGION, AND
ANOTHER
RESPONDENTS
SUIT NO. FSC 139/1961
FEDERAL SUPREME COURT
UNSWORTH,
F.J.
TAYLOR,
F.J.
BAIRAMIAN,
F.J.
11th January, 1962.
Administrative Law - Prerogative writs - Certiorari - Application by aggrieved
party.
Practice and Procedure - Inferior Court - jurisdiction - acting without. courts
- appeals - jurisdiction of Senior District Officer to hear - effect of dismissal
of appeal by Governor.
Interpretations - "Jurisdiction" - "Contigent jurisdiction" meaning of.
25
30
35
40
45
50
ISSUES:
1.
Whether a Senior District Officer has any jurisdiction to hear an appeal presided
over by a District Officer.

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT