DJUKPAN V. OROVUYOVBE & ANOR

Pages151-156
DJUKPAN V, OROVUYOVBE & ANOR
151
cused and the deceased did not attend the dance. This piece of evidence was
not contradicted by the defence.",
as first of all the evidence of the 6th prosecution witness was hearsay and in any
5
case the accused did in fact contradict the evidence as he said in his own evidence
that he was at the dance, and we agree, therefore, that the learned trial judge
misdirected himself in this respect.
Having regard to these misclirections and inadequacies in the judgment
amounting in our view to a serious miscarriage of justice we are unable to uphold
10
his conviction and we accordingly allow this appeal, set aside the judgment and
sentence and enter a verdict of acquittal.
Appeal allowed.
15
DJUKPAN V. OROVUYOVBE & ANOR
20 DEBESI DJUKPAN
APPELLANT
V
RHORHADJOR OROVUYOVBE
RESPONDENTS
AND ANOTHER
SUIT NO. SC 563/1965
25 SUPREME COURT OF NIGERIA
BRETT,
Ag. C.J.N.
COKER,
J.S.C.
LEWIS,
J.S.C.
5th May, 1967
30
Appeals to Supreme Court, Civil - Appeal from appellate decision of High Court
- Leave to argue ground not argued in High Court - change of counsel not
a reason for granting leave - Ruling on sufficiency of stamp - Appeal precluded
- Supreme Court
Act 1960 s.23.
35
Land Instruments Registration Law - Unregistered estate contract - Whether
receivable as acknowledgment of payment of money - illiterates Protection
Ordinance (Now Act) Section 3 & 8 - Purpose of requiring writer to
show address - Sufficiency of particulars - Purpose of requiring writer to
40
mark fees charged - Effect of omission to mark fees - Written agreement
prepared at request of both parties - Writer not benefitting from agreement -
Admissibility of evidence of what took place.
ISSUES:
45
1. Whether change of counsel is a special circumstance on which leave may be
granted to argue grounds which had not been argued on an appeal to the High
Court.
2. Whether a ruling on the sufficiency of a stamp can be questioned on appeal to
the Supreme Court.
50
3. Whether an unregistered estate contract is admissible as an acknowledgement
of the payment of money
4. Whether non-compliance by a writer with section 8 of the Illiterates Protection
Ordinance affects the admissibility of a document.

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT