COKER V. COKER

Pages241-242
COKER V. COKER
241
The Court is of opinion that there was no intention in the Constitution of West-
ern Nigeria (Amendment) Law, 1963, to deprive Alhaji Adegbenro of his costs. His
application succeeds, and it is ordered as follows:
5
1.
That the plaintiff in Suit No. (/161/62, namely the Hon. S.L. Akintola, shall
pay the defendant Alhaji the Hon. D.S. Adegbenro his costs incurred in
the Federal Supreme Court and the sum of £1,140:8s:5d his costs of
appeal incurred in England as his costs in the cause;
2.
That his costs in the Federal Supreme Court be taxed by the Chief
10
Registrar of the Supreme Court, and that a certificate thereof as taxed
by him (or finally allowed in case of review) be annexed to this Order;
3.
That the said plaintiff shall pay the said defendant fifteen guineas as costs
of this application, to which shall be added the fees of drawing up this
Order, the costs of taxation and of the certificate thereof;
15
4.
That this Order be carried out by the High Court of the Western Region.
Appeal Allowed.
20
COKER V. COKER
VICTOR L.L. COKER
25
V
VICTORIA A.A. COKER
SUPREME COURT OF NIGERA
TAYLOR,
J.S.C.
30
BAIRAMIAN,
J.S.C.
MORGAN, Ag. J.S.C.
28th October, 1963.
APPELLANT
RESPONDENT
SUIT NO. FSC 31
7
/
1
963
Appeals - In the Civil Cases - Right of appeal - .Matrimonial Causes
Order
35
for maintenance.
ISSUE:
1. Whether an appeal from an interlocutory order can be entertained without leave
to appeal having first been obirained.
40 FACTS:
The respondent (wife) applied for and was granted an order for permanent
maintenance in the Lagos High Court. The husband appealed against the order.
At the hearing it was objected on the wife's behalf that as no leave to appeal had
been obtained from the interlocutory order, the appeal could not be entertained.
45
There was really no argument on the husband's behalf.
CASES REFERRED TO IN JUDGMENT:
1.
In re W.- (Infants)
(1956) 1 Ch. 384.
2.
Bellenden (formerly Satterthwaite) v. Satterthwaite
(1948) 1 All E.R. 343.
50
3.
Ude and Ors. v. Agu and Ors.
(1961) All N.L.R. 65.
W.O. Odubayo
for the appellant.
N.A. Lardner
for the respondent.

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT