AWOLESI V. N.B.N. LTD.

Pages124-134
124
NIGERIAN SUPREME COURT CASES
[1962] N.S.C.C.
AWOLES1 Q a N.B.N. LTD.
5
M.S. AWOLESI
APPELLANT
V
NATIONAL BANK OF NIGERIA LTD.
RESPONDENT
SUIT NO. FSC 146/1961
FEDERAL SUPREME COURT
UNSWORTH,
F.J.
TAYLOR,
F.J.
BAIRAMIAN,
F.J.
30th March, 1962
10
15
Contract - Guarantee and Indemnity - Discharging of Surety -
Creditor from guaranteed Contract without Surety's consent.
Departure by
Banking - Guarantee of Customer's overdraft on current account
account insulated by bank - Substantial alteration.
- Guaranteed
20
ISSUE:
1.
Whether an agreement altering a guarantee contract made without the consent
25
of the surety discharges the surety of his obligations under the contract.
FACTS:
The Appellan*. auaranteed the account of one Taiwo with the Respondent to the
limit of £10,500. The account had already been overdrawn by over £8,500. The
bank as a result of the guarantee later honoured some cheques making the total
30
amount overdrawn £10.096-16s-9d.
Taiwo later opened an account to which he became overdrawn by about £2,500
which resulted eventually in the bank suing Taiwo and the appellant for the total
sum of £10,025-14s-3d due under the old account. The trial Judge tied up the
three accounts and declared the appellant and Taiwo liable for the sum of £9,610-
35
14s-4d owing on the three accounts (including an account which was only known
during trial).
On appeal, it was contended that the contract of guarantee had been materi-
ally altered by the opening of the subsequent account in Taiwo's name.
HELD:
40
1 An agreement altering a guaranteed contract made without the consent of the
surety discharges the surety unless such alteration is so inconsequential as to
omit any prejudice.
2.
Proof of the alteration being unsubstantial must be shown or the surety will stand
discharged. The alteration here was substantial and the appeal is therefore
45
allowed and judgment against the guarantor set aside.
OBITER:
(Per Bairamian, F.J.) The precedent for a Guarantee for Advances to a Cus-
tomer to be found in the Encyclopaedia of Forms and Precedents, Vol. 2, page
419, is not identical with, but looks not unlike, the form used in this case. It con-
50
tains a paragraph which allows the opening of a fresh account or accounts with
provisions on appropriation. However, it provides that the liberty to open a new
account does not come into being until after the guarantee ceases to be binding
as a continuing security on the guarantor or his estate.

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT