ANABA V. THE STATE

Pages1180-1182
1180
NIGERIAN SUPREME COURT CASES
[1987] 2 N.S.C.C.
Statement of Defence to
arrive at the live issues
in a case where there exists an
Amended Statement of Defence. Once there is an amendment, the original plead-
ing will no longer define the issues to be tried.
In this case the learned trial Judge merely observed that although the Defend-
ants amended their Statement of Defence, they failed to amend their plan to re-
5
flect the new Statement of Defence. It is important to note here that the written
description of the land in the pleadings of the parties should be in complete ac-
cord with the plan or plans filed along with those pleadings. A good plan should
mirror all the features of the land as pleaded. That was the point the learned trial
Judge appeared to be making in his observation now being attacked. I dare say
10
the learned Trial Judge was right.
It was for all the reasons stated above and for the fuller reasons in the lead
Reasons For Judgment
of my learned brother Kawu, J.S.C., which I now adopt as
mine, that I, on the 16th of July, 1987, dismissed this appeal.
15
BELGORE, J.S.C.:
I have had a preview of the reasons for judgment of my
learned brother, Kawu, J.S.C. I agree with his Reasons. I also dismissed this appeal
for the same reasons on the 6th day of July, 1987.
Appeal dismissed.
20
ANABA V. THE STATE
25
JOSEPH ANABA
APPELLANT
V
THE STATE
RESPONDENT
SUIT No. SC 154/1986
30
SUPREME COURT OF NIGERIA
ESO,
J.S.C.
KAWU,
J.S.0
OPUTA,
J.S.C.
J.S.C.
35
NNAEMEKA-AGU, J.S.C.
8th October, 1987
Appeals (Criminal) - Appeal against sentence of death Proscription - Limitation
of tune - 5.31(4) Supreme Court Act, 1960 - Prayer for extension of time
40
within which to appeal.
ISSUE :
1.
Whether the Supreme Court can grant an extension of time within which to
appeal in cases involving sentences of death.
45
FACTS
The Appellant was convicted and sentenced to death by the Isiala Ngwa High
Court, Imo State. The conviction was upheld on appeal to the Court of Appeal on
10/12/84.
He appealed further to the Supreme Court but his Notice of Appeal was dated
50
24/1/85, 14 days out of time, than the 30 days allowed under section 31(2)(6) of
the Supreme Court Act of 1960.

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT