ALUMINIUM INDUSTRIES V. FEDERAL BOARD OF INLAND REVENUE

Pages6-13
6
NIGERIAN SUPREME COURT CASES
[1971] N.S.C.C.
ALUMINIUM INDUSTRIES V. FEDERAL BOARD
OF INLAND REVENUE
ALUMINIUM INDUSTRIES AKTIEN
GESELLSCHAFT
V
APPELLANTS
FEDERAL BOARD OF INLAND
REVENUE
RESPONDENTS
SUPREME COURT OF NIGERIA
SUIT NO. SC 6
4
/
1
970
ADEMOLA,
C.J.N.
COKER,
J.S.C.
LEWIS,
J.S.C.
MADAR1KAN,
J.S.C.
UDOMA,
J.S.C.
15th January, 1971.
Taxation - Foreign companies, taxation o
1 - Reliance on "right to
f - Companies Income Tar Act, 1961,
deeming" provision to the charging section, CI TA.
Commercial Law - Companies - Cop orate idetztity of - Place of resident of
companies -Foreign companies - Choses in action - Contract debt Where
enforceable - Contractual stipulations
Conflict of Laws - International trade - Location of property - Taxation.
ISSUES:
1.
Whether a foreign company can become resident or carry on business in
Nigeria, merely by owning the share capital of a Nigerian company.
2.
Whether the rule that a contract debt is enforceable where the debtor resides
can be displaced by a stipulation for payment elsewhere.
3.
Whether interest on a loan contracted outside Nigeria is payable in Nigeria.
FACTS:
The appellant appealed to the Appeal Commissioners against assessments of
The appellant company was registered and resident in a foreign country. It was
not resident in Nigeria and had no place of business in Nigeria. It owned all the
shares in a Nigerian manufacturing company, and incurred expenditure outside
Nigeria for the Nigeria company on current account. By an agreement made in
the appellant's country, the companies agreed that part of the Nigerian company's
indebtedness on the current account should be transferred to an interest-bearing
loan account in the appellant's country, and that the loan was in the currency of
that country and was to be repaid in that currency. The respondent assessed the
appellant for tax on interest debited to the Nigerian com
The appellant appealed to the A
pany on the loan account.
ppeal Commissioners against the assessments,
on the ground that the interest was not derived and could not be deemed to be
derived from Nigeria because the appellant carried on no trade or business
ιν
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT