AKHIWU V. PRINCIPAL LOTTERIES OFFICER MID-WEST & ANOR.

Pages392-395
AKHIWU V. PRINCIPAL LOTTERIES OFFICER MID-WEST & ANOR. 392
AKHIWU
V. PRINCIPAL LOTTERIES OFFICER
MID-WEST & ANOR.
CHIEF G. A. AKHIWU
V
1.
THE PRINCIPAL LOTTERIES
OFFICER, MID-WESTERN STATE
OF NIGERIA
2.
A.I. EHIAHBI
SUPREME COURT
OF
NIGERIA
COKER,
J.S.C.
UDO-UDOMA,
J.S.C.
FATAI-WILLIAMS, J.S.C.
12th December, 1969.
APPELLANT
1ST RESPONDENT
2ND RESPONDENT
SUIT NO. SC 254/1969
Civil Action - Practice and Procedure - Ruling - Granting application to stay
order of High Court that exhibits be given to police and appellant be prosecuted
pending determination of appeal in Supreme Court Order 8 rule 18(1) and
(5) and (19). Supreme Court Rules on procedure on appeal in respect of
exhibits must be complied with.
ISSUE:
1. Whether it is the proper procedure to leave exhibits in a case on appeal in the
custody of the police.
FACTS:
The applicant was arrested on the orders of a High Court Judge and ordered
to be prosecuted. This was as a result of the opinion expressed by the High Court
Judge that the applicant was acting as an impostor and a rogue in respect of the
exhibit in this case. The trial Judge then ordered that the exhibits be sent to the
police to be used for his prosecution not- withstanding any appeal on the case
before the Supreme Court. The applicant appealed. He also filed an application
in the Supreme Court for a stay of execution and further proceedings on the mat-
ter of appeal, a stay of the trial Judge's order to prosecute him and an order to
be given to the police to hand over all the Exhibits to the Registrar of the Benin
High Court.
HELD:
1. The order made by the court below that "all the exhibits in this case be
impounded and released to the Nigeria Police, any appeal in this matter to the
Supreme Court notwithstanding'; would appear to have ignored completely or
at least not to have had in contemplation the rules of the Supreme Court as to
how exhibits should be treated in the event of an appeal and when an appeal
is pending in the Supreme Court from the judgment of a Judge.
Williams
for the Applicant.
Ikomi
for the Respondents.

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT